Methoden vergelijken
Bekijk de geselecteerde methoden naast elkaar; rijen die verschillen zijn gemarkeerd.
| Additieve Ratio Beoordeling× | ANP× | |
|---|---|---|
| Vakgebied | Besluitvorming | Besluitvorming |
| Familie | MCDM | MCDM |
| Jaar van ontstaan≠ | 2010 | 1996 |
| Grondlegger≠ | Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. | Saaty, T. L. |
| Type≠ | Additive utility ratio (optimal reference row) | Weight_Subjective (pairwise comparison, supermatrix, network structure) |
| Oorspronkelijke bron≠ | Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. (2010). A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision-making. Technological and Economic Development of Economy link ↗ | Saaty, T. L. (1996). Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh ISBN: 0-9620317-9-8 |
| Aliassen | — | — |
| Verwant | 8 | 8 |
| Samenvatting≠ | ARAS (Additive Ratio Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | ANP (Analytic Network Process (AHP with feedback and interdependences)) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1996. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateGegevensset ↗ |
|
|