Methoden vergelijken

	Analytic Hierarchy Process	Beste-Worst Methode	Multi-Attribute Utility Theory
Vakgebied	Besluitvorming	Besluitvorming	Besluitvorming
Familie	MCDM	MCDM	MCDM
Jaar van ontstaan	1980	2015	1976
Grondlegger	Saaty, T. L.	Rezaei, J.	Keeney, R. L., Raiffa, H.
Type	Pairwise comparison (eigenvalue)	Pairwise comparison (best-to-others + others-to-worst vectors), LP	Additive multi-attribute utility function
Oorspronkelijke bron	Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York ISBN: 978-0070543713	Rezaei, J. (2015). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega	Keeney, R. L., Raiffa, H. (1976). Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-offs. Wiley ISBN: 978-0-521-43883-4
Aliassen	—	—	—
Verwant	8	8	8
Samenvatting	AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1980. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.	BWM (Best-Worst Method) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Rezaei, J. in 2015. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.	MAUT (Multi-Attribute Utility Theory) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Keeney, R. L., Raiffa, H. in 1976. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.