ScholarGate
Pembantu
Process / pipelineBrief standardized self-report scales

Rapid Assessment Instrument

A rapid assessment instrument (RAI) is a short, standardized, self-report measure designed to be completed quickly and repeatedly so that a social worker can assess the magnitude of a client's problem, compare it against a validated clinical cutoff, and monitor change over the course of an intervention. The format was championed by Walter Hudson, whose Clinical Measurement Package scales set the template, and was systematized for practitioners by Springer, Abell, and Hudson, who laid out how to create and validate such instruments for practice and research.

Buka dalam MethodMindTidak lama lagiGuna, banding, dapatkan panduan
Alat & sumber
Muat turun slaid
Pelajari & terokai
VideoTidak lama lagi

Baca kaedah sepenuhnya

Ahli sahaja

Log masuk dengan akaun percuma untuk membaca bahagian ini.

Log masuk

Peta kaedah

Kejiranan kaedah berkaitan — pilih satu nod untuk meneroka.

Sumber

  1. Springer, D. W., Abell, N., & Hudson, W. W. (2002). Creating and validating rapid assessment instruments for practice and research: Part 1. Research on Social Work Practice, 12(3), 408–439. DOI: 10.1177/1049731502012003005
  2. Corcoran, K., & Fischer, J. (2013). Measures for Clinical Practice and Research: A Sourcebook (5th ed., Vols. 1–2). Oxford University Press. ISBN: 9780199778591

Cara memetik halaman ini

ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Rapid Assessment Instruments for Clinical Social Work Practice. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/ms/social-work/rapid-assessment-instrument

Kaedah yang mana?

Letakkan kaedah ini di sebelah kaedah yang paling rapat dengannya dan baca secara bersebelahan — perpustakaan menyusun buku di atas meja; pilihan terletak pada anda.

Bandingkan secara bersebelahan

Dirujuk oleh

ScholarGateRapid Assessment Instrument (Rapid Assessment Instruments for Clinical Social Work Practice). Dicapai 2026-06-24 daripada https://scholargate.app/ms/social-work/rapid-assessment-instrument · Set data: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026