ScholarGate
Pembantu
Process / pipelineDigital controversy cartography

Web Controversy Analysis

Web controversy analysis studies scientific, technical, and public controversies through the traces they leave online—hyperlink networks, search-engine results, and social-media activity. Building on the controversy-mapping tradition but reworking it as a web-native digital method, it follows Tommaso Venturini's call to 'build on faults' and Noortje Marres's argument for controversy analysis as a digital method, using crawling and co-link analysis to reveal how positions in a dispute are connected, opposed, and arranged across the web.

Buka dalam MethodMindTidak lama lagiGuna, banding, dapatkan panduan
Alat & sumber
Muat turun slaid
Pelajari & terokai
VideoTidak lama lagi

Baca kaedah sepenuhnya

Ahli sahaja

Log masuk dengan akaun percuma untuk membaca bahagian ini.

Log masuk

Peta kaedah

Kejiranan kaedah berkaitan — pilih satu nod untuk meneroka.

Sumber

  1. Venturini, T. (2012). Building on faults: how to represent controversies with digital methods. Public Understanding of Science, 21(7), 796-812. DOI: 10.1177/0963662510387558
  2. Marres, N. (2015). Why map issues? On controversy analysis as a digital method. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 40(5), 655-686. DOI: 10.1177/0162243915574602

Cara memetik halaman ini

ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Web-Based Controversy Analysis. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/ms/science-technology-studies/web-controversy-analysis

Kaedah yang mana?

Letakkan kaedah ini di sebelah kaedah yang paling rapat dengannya dan baca secara bersebelahan — perpustakaan menyusun buku di atas meja; pilihan terletak pada anda.

Bandingkan secara bersebelahan

Dirujuk oleh

ScholarGateWeb Controversy Analysis (Web-Based Controversy Analysis). Dicapai 2026-06-24 daripada https://scholargate.app/ms/science-technology-studies/web-controversy-analysis · Set data: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026