ScholarGate
Pembantu
Process / pipelineNetwork and collaborative governance studies

Collaborative Governance Assessment

Collaborative governance assessment is a framework for analysing arrangements in which public agencies and non-state stakeholders deliberate together to make or implement public policy by consensus. Synthesised by Chris Ansell and Alison Gash in their 2008 article from a meta-analysis of over a hundred cases, it identifies the starting conditions, institutional design and facilitative leadership that feed into an iterative collaborative process and ultimately shape outcomes. The framework treats collaboration not as a single event but as a cycle of face-to-face dialogue, trust-building, shared understanding and intermediate commitments. Its purpose is to explain why some multi-stakeholder partnerships succeed while others stall or collapse.

Buka dalam MethodMindTidak lama lagiGuna, banding, dapatkan panduan
Alat & sumber
Muat turun slaid
Pelajari & terokai
VideoTidak lama lagi

Baca kaedah sepenuhnya

Ahli sahaja

Log masuk dengan akaun percuma untuk membaca bahagian ini.

Log masuk

Peta kaedah

Kejiranan kaedah berkaitan — pilih satu nod untuk meneroka.

Sumber

  1. Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. DOI: 10.1093/jopart/mum032

Cara memetik halaman ini

ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Collaborative Governance Assessment Framework. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/ms/public-administration/collaborative-governance-assessment

Kaedah yang mana?

Letakkan kaedah ini di sebelah kaedah yang paling rapat dengannya dan baca secara bersebelahan — perpustakaan menyusun buku di atas meja; pilihan terletak pada anda.

Bandingkan secara bersebelahan

Dirujuk oleh

ScholarGateCollaborative Governance Assessment (Collaborative Governance Assessment Framework). Dicapai 2026-06-24 daripada https://scholargate.app/ms/public-administration/collaborative-governance-assessment · Set data: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026