Political Ideology Scaling
Political ideology scaling estimates actors' positions on one or more latent ideological dimensions from their observed choices, most often legislators' roll-call votes, but also survey responses and donations. The dominant methods are Poole and Rosenthal's NOMINATE (1985) and the Bayesian item-response-theory (IRT) approach of Clinton, Jackman and Rivers (2004), which place legislators and the proposals they vote on in a common spatial map.
Baca kaedah sepenuhnya
Log masuk dengan akaun percuma untuk membaca bahagian ini.
Peta kaedah
Kejiranan kaedah berkaitan — pilih satu nod untuk meneroka.
Sumber
- Poole, K. T., & Rosenthal, H. (1985). A spatial model for legislative roll call analysis. American Journal of Political Science, 29(2), 357-384. DOI: 10.2307/2111172 ↗
- Clinton, J., Jackman, S., & Rivers, D. (2004). The statistical analysis of roll call data. American Political Science Review, 98(2), 355-370. DOI: 10.1017/S0003055404001194 ↗
Cara memetik halaman ini
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Ideal Point Estimation and Political Ideology Scaling. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/ms/political-psychology/political-ideology-scaling
Kaedah yang mana?
Letakkan kaedah ini di sebelah kaedah yang paling rapat dengannya dan baca secara bersebelahan — perpustakaan menyusun buku di atas meja; pilihan terletak pada anda.
- Candidate Evaluation ModelPsikologi Politik↔ banding
- Ideological Constraint AnalysisPsikologi Politik↔ banding
- Skala Ideologi PolitikPsikologi Politik↔ banding
- Political Sophistication MeasurementPsikologi Politik↔ banding
Dirujuk oleh
Kaedah serupa
Terjumpa masalah pada halaman ini? Laporkan atau cadangkan pembetulan →