Resource Curse Analysis
Resource curse analysis is the empirical study of the paradox that economies rich in natural resources — oil, gas, minerals — often grow more slowly, remain less democratic, and suffer more conflict than resource-poor economies. Jeffrey Sachs and Andrew Warner's influential work, summarized in their 2001 European Economic Review article, documented a robust negative cross-country correlation between resource dependence and economic growth. Michael Ross's 2001 World Politics article extended the logic to politics, showing statistically that oil wealth is associated with weaker democracy through rentier, repression, and modernization mechanisms. The workhorse method is a cross-country regression of growth or democracy on a measure of resource dependence with controls for the standard determinants of development.
Baca kaedah sepenuhnya
Log masuk dengan akaun percuma untuk membaca bahagian ini.
Peta kaedah
Kejiranan kaedah berkaitan — pilih satu nod untuk meneroka.
Sumber
- Sachs, J. D., & Warner, A. M. (2001). Natural Resources and Economic Development: The Curse of Natural Resources. European Economic Review, 45(4-6), 827-838. DOI: 10.1016/S0014-2921(01)00125-8 ↗
- Ross, M. L. (2001). Does Oil Hinder Democracy? World Politics, 53(3), 325-361. DOI: 10.1353/wp.2001.0011 ↗
Cara memetik halaman ini
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Resource Curse Analysis (Natural Resource Dependence and Development). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/ms/political-economy/resource-curse-analysis
Kaedah yang mana?
Letakkan kaedah ini di sebelah kaedah yang paling rapat dengannya dan baca secara bersebelahan — perpustakaan menyusun buku di atas meja; pilihan terletak pada anda.
- Dependency AnalysisPolitical Economy↔ banding
- Rent-Seeking AnalysisPolitical Economy↔ banding
- State Autonomy AnalysisPolitical Economy↔ banding
Kaedah serupa
Terjumpa masalah pada halaman ini? Laporkan atau cadangkan pembetulan →