ScholarGate
Pembantu
Process / pipelineNonmarket valuation

Benefit Transfer Method

Benefit transfer is the practice of estimating the economic value of a nonmarket good — clean water, a recreation site, an endangered species, an avoided health risk — at a new 'policy site' by adapting value estimates from one or more existing 'study sites' where primary valuation research was already conducted. Because original contingent-valuation, choice-experiment, or hedonic studies are expensive and slow, analysts facing limited time and budgets transfer existing results, ranging from simply borrowing a single dollar value (unit value transfer) to transplanting an entire estimated valuation function (function transfer) or predicting from a meta-regression of many prior studies.

Terapkan dengan EconMindTidak lama lagiGuna, banding, dapatkan panduan
Alat & sumber
Muat turun slaid
Pelajari & terokai
VideoTidak lama lagi

Baca kaedah sepenuhnya

Ahli sahaja

Log masuk dengan akaun percuma untuk membaca bahagian ini.

Log masuk

Peta kaedah

Kejiranan kaedah berkaitan — pilih satu nod untuk meneroka.

Sumber

  1. Rosenberger, R. S., & Loomis, J. B. (2003). Benefit transfer. In P. A. Champ, K. J. Boyle, & T. C. Brown (Eds.), A Primer on Nonmarket Valuation. Kluwer/Springer. ISBN: 9780792364986
  2. Boyle, K. J., & Bergstrom, J. C. (1992). Benefit transfer studies: myths, pragmatism, and idealism. Water Resources Research, 28(3), 657–663. DOI: 10.1029/91WR02591

Cara memetik halaman ini

ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Benefit Transfer for Nonmarket Valuation. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/ms/economics/benefit-transfer-method

Kaedah yang mana?

Letakkan kaedah ini di sebelah kaedah yang paling rapat dengannya dan baca secara bersebelahan — perpustakaan menyusun buku di atas meja; pilihan terletak pada anda.

Bandingkan secara bersebelahan
ScholarGateBenefit Transfer Method (Benefit Transfer for Nonmarket Valuation). Dicapai 2026-06-24 daripada https://scholargate.app/ms/economics/benefit-transfer-method · Set data: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026