Bandingkan kaedah
Semak kaedah pilihan anda secara bersebelahan; baris yang berbeza akan diserlahkan.
| Analisis Ko-Sitanan Bantuan VOSviewer× | Analisis Ko-Sitan× | |
|---|---|---|
| Bidang≠ | Saintometrik | Bibliometrik |
| Keluarga | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Tahun asal≠ | 1973 (co-citation); VOSviewer workflow from ~2010 | 1973 |
| Pengasas≠ | Henry Small (co-citation, 1973); Nees Jan van Eck & Ludo Waltman (VOSviewer, 2010) | Henry Small |
| Jenis≠ | Bibliometric network analysis | Method |
| Sumber perintis | Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265–269. DOI ↗ | Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265–269. DOI ↗ |
| Alias | VOSviewer co-citation mapping, bibliometric co-citation visualization, co-citation network analysis with VOSviewer, CCA-VOSviewer | co-citation mapping, historiograph, direct citation, citation pair analysis |
| Berkaitan≠ | 6 | 5 |
| Ringkasan≠ | VOSviewer-assisted co-citation analysis combines Henry Small's co-citation measure — counting how often two documents are jointly cited by later work — with VOSviewer's automated network construction and visual mapping capabilities. The result is a spatial map of the intellectual base of a research field, where documents that share many citing contexts cluster together, revealing foundational schools of thought and their relationships. | Co-citation analysis is a method that identifies the intellectual structure of a research domain by examining how frequently pairs of documents are cited together in other publications. When two papers are frequently cited together in the literature, they are considered co-cited, indicating they are conceptually related or influential within the same research community. Developed by Henry Small in 1973, co-citation analysis maps the 'invisible colleges' of science—networks of researchers working on related problems—and reveals how knowledge domains evolve over time. |
| ScholarGateSet data ↗ |
|
|