ScholarGate
Pembantu

Bandingkan kaedah

Semak kaedah pilihan anda secara bersebelahan; baris yang berbeza akan diserlahkan.

Analisis Sensitiviti untuk Kausaliti dalam Penyelidikan Pendidikan×Kaedah Padanan (CEM / Optimal / Genetik)×
BidangInferens KausalInferens Kausal
KeluargaRegression modelRegression model
Tahun asal1983–20022012
PengasasPaul R. Rosenbaum (formal framework); applied in education research by Briggs and othersIacus, King & Porro (CEM); Hansen (optimal/full matching)
JenisCausal robustness / bias assessmentMatching for causal inference
Sumber perintisRosenbaum, P. R. (2002). Observational Studies (2nd ed.). Springer. ISBN: 978-0387989679Iacus, S. M., King, G., & Porro, G. (2012). Causal Inference without Balance Checking: Coarsened Exact Matching. Political Analysis, 20(1), 1-24. DOI ↗
AliasRosenbaum sensitivity analysis, hidden-bias sensitivity analysis, causal sensitivity analysis, SA for causal education studiescoarsened exact matching, optimal matching, genetic matching, CEM
Berkaitan65
RingkasanSensitivity analysis for causality in education research tests how robust a quasi-experimental finding is to unmeasured confounding. Rather than assuming all bias has been removed, it quantifies how large a hidden bias would need to be to overturn a causal conclusion — a critical safeguard when randomisation is impossible, which is common in educational settings.Matching Methods are a family of causal-inference techniques beyond propensity-score matching that pair treated and control units with similar covariates so that a treatment effect can be read off the balanced sample. The family includes Coarsened Exact Matching (Iacus, King & Porro, 2012), optimal matching, and genetic matching.
ScholarGateSet data
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sumber
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sumber
  3. PUBLISHED

Pergi ke carian Muat turun slaid

ScholarGateBandingkan kaedah: Sensitivity analysis for causality in education research · Matching Methods. Dicapai 2026-06-18 daripada https://scholargate.app/ms/compare