Bandingkan kaedah
Semak kaedah pilihan anda secara bersebelahan; baris yang berbeza akan diserlahkan.
| Schwartz Value Survey× | Skala Ideologi Politik× | |
|---|---|---|
| Bidang | Psikologi Politik | Psikologi Politik |
| Keluarga | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Tahun asal≠ | 1992 | 1990 |
| Pengasas≠ | Shalom H. Schwartz | Hans-Dieter Klingemann & Norberto Bobbio |
| Jenis≠ | Self-report values survey | Self-report |
| Sumber perintis≠ | Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 1-65. DOI ↗ | Fuchs, D., & Klingemann, H. D. (1990). The left-right schema. In M. Kent Jennings & Jan W. Van Deth (Eds.), Continuities in political action. Berlin: De Gruyter. link ↗ |
| Alias | SVS, Schwartz Theory of Basic Values, Portrait Values Questionnaire | Left-Right Scale, Ideology Continuum, Political Spectrum Scale |
| Berkaitan≠ | 4 | 3 |
| Ringkasan≠ | The Schwartz Value Survey (SVS) operationalizes Schwartz's (1992) theory of basic human values, which identifies ten (later refined to nineteen) motivationally distinct values organized in a circular structure along two axes: openness to change versus conservation, and self-enhancement versus self-transcendence. It is the most widely used cross-cultural values instrument and underlies much research on the value basis of political ideology. | The Political Ideology Scale measures individual self-placement on a left-right political spectrum, capturing fundamental preferences for government role, economic organization, and social values. The single-item self-placement measure (most common) asks respondents to rate themselves on a 0-10 or 0-100 continuum; multi-item versions assess distinct ideological dimensions (economic policy, social policy, nationalism). The left-right axis remains the dominant organizing principle of political competition globally, predicting party choice, policy preferences, and electoral behavior despite critiques that it oversimplifies multidimensional political space. |
| ScholarGateSet data ↗ |
|
|