Bandingkan kaedah
Semak kaedah pilihan anda secara bersebelahan; baris yang berbeza akan diserlahkan.
| Teori Beralasan Berasaskan Pelbagai Kajian Kes Straussian× | Reka Bentuk Kajian Pelbagai Kes× | |
|---|---|---|
| Bidang | Kualitatif | Kualitatif |
| Keluarga | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Tahun asal≠ | 1990s (synthesis of Strauss & Corbin 1990 and multi-case design conventions) | 1980s–1990s (Yin's first edition 1984; Stake's collective case study concept 1995) |
| Pengasas≠ | Anselm Strauss & Juliet Corbin (Straussian GT); multiple-case design formalized by Robert K. Yin and Kathleen Eisenhardt | Robert K. Yin (systematic replication logic); Robert E. Stake (naturalistic/collective case tradition) |
| Jenis≠ | Qualitative research design and analytic strategy | Qualitative research method |
| Sumber perintis≠ | Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Sage. ISBN: 978-0803932500 | Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506336169 |
| Alias | multi-case Straussian GT, Strauss-Corbin grounded theory across cases, multiple-site Straussian grounded theory, multi-case GT (Strauss & Corbin) | comparative case study, multi-site case study, collective case study, cross-case analysis |
| Berkaitan | 6 | 6 |
| Ringkasan≠ | Multiple case-based Straussian grounded theory combines Strauss and Corbin's systematic coding procedures — open, axial, and selective coding — with a multiple case design in which the same grounded theory analysis is conducted across two or more purposively selected cases. The approach aims to generate a mid-range theory grounded in rich, cross-case qualitative data while capitalizing on the comparative leverage offered by multiple sites or units, ultimately producing a theory with broader scope and stronger transferability than a single-case grounded theory study. | Multiple-case study design investigates two or more bounded real-world cases using the same research protocol, then compares findings across cases to identify patterns, contrasts, and explanatory insights that a single case could not produce. Developed primarily through Robert Yin's replication logic and Robert Stake's collective case tradition, the approach is particularly powerful when a researcher needs to determine whether a phenomenon occurs under varied conditions or to test an emerging theoretical explanation against rival contexts. |
| ScholarGateSet data ↗ |
|
|