Bandingkan kaedah
Semak kaedah pilihan anda secara bersebelahan; baris yang berbeza akan diserlahkan.
| Reka Bentuk Kajian Teori Berasaskan Pelbagai Kes× | Grounded Theory× | |
|---|---|---|
| Bidang≠ | Kualitatif | Penyelidikan Kualitatif |
| Keluarga | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Tahun asal≠ | 1980s–1990s (integrative development) | 1967 |
| Pengasas≠ | Synthesised from Kathleen Eisenhardt (multiple-case logic) and Barney Glaser & Anselm Strauss (grounded theory) | Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss |
| Jenis≠ | Qualitative research design combining case study and grounded theory | Method |
| Sumber perintis≠ | Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550. DOI ↗ | Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine. link ↗ |
| Alias≠ | multi-case grounded theory, MCGT, comparative case grounded theory, cross-case grounded theory | GT, Grounded Theory Approach |
| Berkaitan≠ | 6 | 3 |
| Ringkasan≠ | Multiple case-based grounded theory is a qualitative research design that embeds grounded theory's inductive coding logic inside a structured multiple-case framework. Rather than generating theory from a single site or interview pool, researchers iteratively collect and analyze data across two or more purposefully selected cases, using constant comparison both within and across cases until theoretical saturation is reached. The result is a substantive theory grounded in rich, cross-site empirical evidence. | Grounded Theory (GT) is a systematic qualitative research methodology in which theory emerges directly from data through iterative analysis, rather than being imposed before data collection. Developed by Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss in 1967, GT prioritizes generating explanatory frameworks grounded in evidence. |
| ScholarGateSet data ↗ |
|
|