Bandingkan kaedah
Semak kaedah pilihan anda secara bersebelahan; baris yang berbeza akan diserlahkan.
| Teori Utiliti Pelbagai Atribut× | Proses Rangkaian Analitik (AHP dengan maklum balas dan kebergantungan)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Bidang | Pembuatan Keputusan | Pembuatan Keputusan |
| Keluarga | MCDM | MCDM |
| Tahun asal≠ | 1976 | 1996 |
| Pengasas≠ | Keeney, R. L., Raiffa, H. | Saaty, T. L. |
| Jenis≠ | Additive multi-attribute utility function | Weight_Subjective (pairwise comparison, supermatrix, network structure) |
| Sumber perintis≠ | Keeney, R. L., Raiffa, H. (1976). Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-offs. Wiley ISBN: 978-0-521-43883-4 | Saaty, T. L. (1996). Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh ISBN: 0-9620317-9-8 |
| Alias | — | — |
| Berkaitan | 8 | 8 |
| Ringkasan≠ | MAUT (Multi-Attribute Utility Theory) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Keeney, R. L., Raiffa, H. in 1976. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | ANP (Analytic Network Process (AHP with feedback and interdependences)) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1996. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateSet data ↗ |
|
|