ScholarGate
Pembantu

Bandingkan kaedah

Semak kaedah pilihan anda secara bersebelahan; baris yang berbeza akan diserlahkan.

Kaedah Padanan (CEM / Optimal / Genetik)×Analisis Sensitiviti untuk Bias Tersembunyi (Rosenbaum Bounds / E-value)×
BidangInferens KausalInferens Kausal
KeluargaRegression modelRegression model
Tahun asal20122002
PengasasIacus, King & Porro (CEM); Hansen (optimal/full matching)Paul R. Rosenbaum (bounds); Tyler J. VanderWeele & Peng Ding (E-value)
JenisMatching for causal inferenceSensitivity analysis for causal inference
Sumber perintisIacus, S. M., King, G., & Porro, G. (2012). Causal Inference without Balance Checking: Coarsened Exact Matching. Political Analysis, 20(1), 1-24. DOI ↗Rosenbaum, P. R. (2002). Observational Studies (2nd ed.). Springer. ISBN: 978-0387989679
Aliascoarsened exact matching, optimal matching, genetic matching, CEMRosenbaum bounds, E-value, hidden bias sensitivity analysis, unmeasured confounding sensitivity
Berkaitan55
RingkasanMatching Methods are a family of causal-inference techniques beyond propensity-score matching that pair treated and control units with similar covariates so that a treatment effect can be read off the balanced sample. The family includes Coarsened Exact Matching (Iacus, King & Porro, 2012), optimal matching, and genetic matching.Sensitivity analysis for hidden bias is a family of methods that quantify how strongly an unmeasured confounder would have to operate before it could overturn a causal conclusion drawn from observational data. It was crystallised by Paul Rosenbaum's sensitivity bounds (2002) and extended by VanderWeele and Ding's E-value (2017).
ScholarGateSet data
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sumber
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sumber
  3. PUBLISHED

Pergi ke carian Muat turun slaid

ScholarGateBandingkan kaedah: Matching Methods · Sensitivity Analysis for Unmeasured Confounding. Dicapai 2026-06-15 daripada https://scholargate.app/ms/compare