Bandingkan kaedah
Semak kaedah pilihan anda secara bersebelahan; baris yang berbeza akan diserlahkan.
| Analisis Dokumen Interpretif× | Analisis Wacana Kritis Interpretif× | |
|---|---|---|
| Bidang | Kualitatif | Kualitatif |
| Keluarga | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Tahun asal≠ | 2000s (building on hermeneutic traditions from the 20th century) | 1990s–2000s |
| Pengasas≠ | Glenn Bowen (systematic method); Lindsay Prior (social use of documents) | Norman Fairclough; Ruth Wodak; Teun A. van Dijk (interpretive framing developed through constructivist qualitative traditions) |
| Jenis≠ | Qualitative document-based research method | Qualitative discourse analysis design |
| Sumber perintis≠ | Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. DOI ↗ | Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Polity Press. ISBN: 978-0745612126 |
| Alias | interpretive documentary analysis, hermeneutic document analysis, qualitative document analysis, interpretive textual analysis | interpretive CDA, constructivist critical discourse analysis, meaning-centred CDA, CDA-interpretivist |
| Berkaitan | 6 | 6 |
| Ringkasan≠ | Interpretive document analysis is a qualitative method that systematically examines written, visual, or digital documents to construct meaning from them within their social, historical, and institutional contexts. Rather than simply counting content categories, it reads documents as social artefacts — asking not only what a document says, but what it does, who produced it, for what purpose, and what assumptions it encodes. The approach draws on hermeneutic and interpretive traditions to move between individual passages and the broader context in which they were created. | Interpretive critical discourse analysis (interpretive CDA) combines the power-and-ideology lens of critical discourse analysis with an interpretivist epistemology that foregrounds meaning-making, context, and the researcher's own positionality. It examines how language constructs social reality, legitimises or challenges power relations, and circulates ideological assumptions — while acknowledging that both the texts under study and the analyst's reading of them are socially situated and context-dependent. |
| ScholarGateSet data ↗ |
|
|