Bandingkan kaedah
Semak kaedah pilihan anda secara bersebelahan; baris yang berbeza akan diserlahkan.
| Analisis Kes Undang-undang Kritikal× | Analisis Hermeneutik× | |
|---|---|---|
| Bidang | Kaedah Lapangan | Kaedah Lapangan |
| Keluarga | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Tahun asal≠ | Late 1970s–1980s (CLS conference 1977; Unger 1983) | 19th–20th century (Schleiermacher ~1819; Dilthey ~1883; Gadamer 1960; Ricoeur 1969) |
| Pengasas≠ | Critical Legal Studies (CLS) movement; key figures include Duncan Kennedy, Roberto Unger, Mark Tushnet | Friedrich Schleiermacher; Wilhelm Dilthey; Hans-Georg Gadamer; Paul Ricoeur |
| Jenis≠ | Qualitative legal research approach | Qualitative interpretive method |
| Sumber perintis≠ | Unger, R. M. (1983). The Critical Legal Studies Movement. Harvard Law Review, 96(3), 561–675. link ↗ | Gadamer, H.-G. (1975). Truth and Method (G. Barden & J. Cumming, Trans.). Seabury Press. (Original work published 1960 as Wahrheit und Methode). ISBN: 978-0826400185 |
| Alias | critical legal analysis, CLS case analysis, critical judicial analysis, critical legal reading | hermeneutics, hermeneutical interpretation, interpretive hermeneutics, philosophical hermeneutics |
| Berkaitan | 6 | 6 |
| Ringkasan≠ | Critical case law analysis applies the theoretical tools of Critical Legal Studies (CLS) to the examination of judicial decisions. Rather than accepting legal reasoning at face value, this approach interrogates how courts construct legal arguments, whose interests those arguments serve, and how ideological commitments are concealed beneath the appearance of neutral doctrinal logic. It exposes the political and social dimensions embedded in judicial language and outcomes. | Hermeneutic analysis is a qualitative interpretive method for uncovering the meaning of texts, documents, spoken discourse, or human actions. Rooted in 19th-century biblical and legal scholarship and systematised by Schleiermacher, Dilthey, Gadamer, and Ricoeur, it operates through the hermeneutic circle: the meaning of a part is understood through the whole, and the meaning of the whole is revised as parts are interpreted. The goal is not to measure or code, but to achieve a deepening, dialogic understanding of the object of interpretation. |
| ScholarGateSet data ↗ |
|
|