ScholarGate
Pembantu

Bandingkan kaedah

Semak kaedah pilihan anda secara bersebelahan; baris yang berbeza akan diserlahkan.

Validitas Konstruk×Kesahan Diskriminan×
BidangPsikometrikPsikometrik
KeluargaLatent structureLatent structure
Tahun asal19551959
PengasasLee J. Cronbach & Paul E. MeehlDonald T. Campbell and Donald W. Fiske
JenisValidity evaluation frameworkValidity evidence / psychometric evaluation
Sumber perintisCronbach, L. J. & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. DOI ↗
Aliasconstruct validation, factorial validity, nomological validity evidence, validity of interpretationdiscriminant validity evidence, divergent validity, DV, AVE-based discriminant validity
Berkaitan65
RingkasanConstruct validity is the degree to which a test or scale actually measures the theoretical construct it is intended to measure. Introduced by Cronbach and Meehl in 1955, it is the central validity concern in psychological and educational measurement, evaluated by accumulating multiple lines of empirical and logical evidence rather than by any single statistical test.Discriminant validity is evidence that a latent construct is empirically distinct from other constructs it should differ from. Originating in Campbell and Fiske's multitrait-multimethod framework (1959), it is a core component of construct validity and a mandatory check in scale development and structural equation modeling.
ScholarGateSet data
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sumber
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sumber
  3. PUBLISHED

Pergi ke carian Muat turun slaid

ScholarGateBandingkan kaedah: Construct Validity · Discriminant Validity. Dicapai 2026-06-15 daripada https://scholargate.app/ms/compare