ScholarGate
Pembantu

Bandingkan kaedah

Semak kaedah pilihan anda secara bersebelahan; baris yang berbeza akan diserlahkan.

Ujian Post-Hoc Conover-Iman×Ujian Friedman×
BidangStatistikStatistik
KeluargaRegression modelHypothesis test
Tahun asal19791937
PengasasConover & ImanMilton Friedman
JenisNonparametric post-hoc multiple comparisonNonparametric repeated-measures comparison (by ranks)
Sumber perintisConover, W. J. & Iman, R. L. (1979). On Multiple-Comparisons Procedures. Technical Report LA-7677-MS, Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory. link ↗Friedman, M. (1937). The use of ranks to avoid the assumption of normality implicit in the analysis of variance. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 32(200), 675–701. DOI ↗
AliasConover-Iman post-hoc test, Conover post-hoc test, Conover-Iman Post-Hoc TestiFriedman two-way analysis of variance by ranks, Friedman rank test, Friedman Testi
Berkaitan32
RingkasanThe Conover-Iman test is a rank-based post-hoc procedure, introduced by Conover and Iman in 1979, that identifies which pairs of groups differ after a significant Kruskal-Wallis or Friedman test. It builds a t-style statistic on the pooled ranks and is generally more powerful than the comparable Dunn test.The Friedman test is a nonparametric hypothesis test that compares three or more related conditions measured on the same blocks or subjects, serving as the rank-based alternative to repeated-measures ANOVA. It was introduced by Milton Friedman in 1937 and works on ordinal or continuous data without assuming normality.
ScholarGateSet data
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sumber
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Sumber
  3. PUBLISHED

Pergi ke carian Muat turun slaid

ScholarGateBandingkan kaedah: Conover-Iman Test · Friedman test. Dicapai 2026-06-17 daripada https://scholargate.app/ms/compare