Bandingkan kaedah
Semak kaedah pilihan anda secara bersebelahan; baris yang berbeza akan diserlahkan.
| Concept Mapping× | Community Needs Assessment× | |
|---|---|---|
| Bidang | Social Work | Social Work |
| Keluarga | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Tahun asal≠ | 1989 | 1972 |
| Pengasas≠ | William M. K. Trochim | Social-planning tradition; need typology by Jonathan Bradshaw |
| Jenis≠ | Mixed-method structured group conceptualization producing a visual cluster map | Systematic assessment of the unmet needs of a community or population |
| Sumber perintis≠ | Trochim, W. M. K. (1989). An introduction to concept mapping for planning and evaluation. Evaluation and Program Planning, 12(1), 1–16. DOI ↗ | Bradshaw, J. (1972). A taxonomy of social need. In G. McLachlan (Ed.), Problems and Progress in Medical Care: Essays on Current Research, 7th Series (pp. 71–82). Oxford University Press. link ↗ |
| Alias | Group Concept Mapping, Structured Conceptualization, Trochim Concept Mapping, Concept Mapping for Planning and Evaluation | Needs Assessment, Community Needs Analysis, Needs Assessment Survey, Community Assessment |
| Berkaitan | 4 | 4 |
| Ringkasan≠ | Concept mapping, in the structured sense developed by William Trochim, is a mixed-method process that lets a group develop a shared conceptual framework on a topic and represent it as a visual map. Participants generate statements about a focus question, sort them into thematic piles, and rate them; multidimensional scaling and cluster analysis then turn those sortings into a two-dimensional map of clustered ideas. Widely used in social-work and human-services planning and evaluation, it combines the openness of group brainstorming with the rigor of quantitative analysis to surface and structure stakeholder thinking. | A community needs assessment is a systematic process for identifying, documenting, and prioritizing the unmet needs of a community or population in order to plan programs, allocate resources, and justify funding. It draws on multiple kinds of evidence — statistical indicators, what people say they need, the services they actually seek, and comparisons with other areas — and a guiding typology, such as Jonathan Bradshaw's four types of social need, helps assessors recognize that 'need' is not a single, self-evident quantity but a judgment that depends on whose definition and which standard is applied. |
| ScholarGateSet data ↗ |
|
|