ScholarGate
Pembantu

Bandingkan kaedah

Semak kaedah pilihan anda secara bersebelahan; baris yang berbeza akan diserlahkan.

Autoetnografi Perbandingan×Analisis Tematik Refleksif×
BidangKualitatifKualitatif
KeluargaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Tahun asal1979 (autoethnography); comparative application formalized ~20132006 (seminal paper); explicitly named 'reflexive' from ~2019
PengasasHayano (term); developed further by Ellis, Bochner, Chang, Ngunjiri & HernandezVirginia Braun & Victoria Clarke
JenisQualitative research designQualitative research method
Sumber perintisChang, H., Ngunjiri, F. W., & Hernandez, K.-A. C. (2013). Collaborative Autoethnography. Left Coast Press. ISBN: 978-1598745948Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗
Aliascollaborative autoethnography, multi-sited autoethnography, cross-cultural autoethnography, CAERTA, reflexive TA, Braun and Clarke thematic analysis, qualitative thematic analysis
Berkaitan66
RingkasanComparative autoethnography is a qualitative design in which two or more researchers — or research participants — independently produce first-person self-narratives about a shared phenomenon and then systematically compare those accounts to generate broader cultural insight. By juxtaposing lived experiences that differ by context, identity, or setting, the approach moves beyond the single-voice limitations of traditional autoethnography while retaining its hallmark reflexivity and personal depth.Reflexive Thematic Analysis (RTA) is a widely used qualitative method for identifying, analysing, and interpreting patterns of shared meaning — called themes — across a dataset. Developed by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke, it is theoretically flexible, works across epistemological positions, and foregrounds the researcher's active, interpretive role rather than treating themes as features that simply emerge from data. It differs from older 'codebook' approaches by treating the analyst's subjectivity as a resource rather than a source of bias to be suppressed.
ScholarGateSet data
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sumber
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sumber
  3. PUBLISHED

Pergi ke carian Muat turun slaid

ScholarGateBandingkan kaedah: Comparative autoethnography · Reflexive Thematic Analysis. Dicapai 2026-06-18 daripada https://scholargate.app/ms/compare