ScholarGate
Pembantu

Bandingkan kaedah

Semak kaedah pilihan anda secara bersebelahan; baris yang berbeza akan diserlahkan.

Proses Rangkaian Analitik (AHP dengan maklum balas dan kebergantungan)×Penilaian Berkaitan Kompleks×
BidangPembuatan KeputusanPembuatan Keputusan
KeluargaMCDMMCDM
Tahun asal19961996
PengasasSaaty, T. L.Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A.
JenisWeight_Subjective (pairwise comparison, supermatrix, network structure)Proportional assessment (benefit/cost split)
Sumber perintisSaaty, T. L. (1996). Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh ISBN: 0-9620317-9-8Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. (1996). Determination of an Efficient Contractor by Using the New Method of Multicriteria Assessment. International Symposium for The Organization and Management of Construction. Shaping Theory and Practice. Vol. 2: Managing the Construction Project and Managing Risk. CIB W 65 link ↗
Alias
Berkaitan88
RingkasanANP (Analytic Network Process (AHP with feedback and interdependences)) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1996. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.COPRAS (Complex Proportional Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. in 1996. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateSet data
  1. v1
  2. 1 Sumber
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Sumber
  3. PUBLISHED

Pergi ke carian Muat turun slaid

ScholarGateBandingkan kaedah: ANP · COPRAS. Dicapai 2026-06-19 daripada https://scholargate.app/ms/compare