Leisure Constraints Negotiation Model
The leisure constraints negotiation model studies how people who encounter obstacles to participation do not simply abstain but instead deploy strategies that allow them to take part anyway, often in modified form. Building on Crawford, Jackson and Godbey's tripartite classification of constraints into intrapersonal, interpersonal, and structural types, Jackson, Crawford and Godbey's 1993 paper overturned the prevailing assumption that constraints are insurmountable barriers, arguing instead that participation is the outcome of a negotiation process in which motivation and effort can offset constraint. Hubbard and Mannell's 2001 study formalized this insight by pitting four competing models of the constraint-negotiation process against one another with structural equation modeling, establishing the constraint-effects-mitigation model as the dominant account. The framework reframes non-participation as just one possible endpoint of an active negotiation rather than the inevitable consequence of facing a constraint.
出典記録
引用は手法の出典記録からそのままコピーされています。それらからレベルごとの検証は推論されません。
- Jackson, E. L., Crawford, D. W., & Godbey, G. (1993). Negotiation of leisure constraints. Leisure Sciences, 15(1), 1-11. · DOI 10.1080/01490409309513182
- Hubbard, J., & Mannell, R. C. (2001). Testing competing models of the leisure constraint negotiation process in a corporate employee recreation setting. Leisure Sciences, 23(3), 145-163. · DOI 10.1080/014904001316896846
- Crawford, D. W., Jackson, E. L., & Godbey, G. (1991). A hierarchical model of leisure constraints. Leisure Sciences, 13(4), 309-320. · DOI 10.1080/01490409109513147
キュレーションされた主張
主張は証拠台帳に永続化され、それぞれが独自の評価を持っています。
このビューは、台帳に主張評価がない場合、主張評価を生成しません。
関連手法
手法グラフから生成され、機械が提案した関係として表示されます — 証拠主張は推論されません。