Responding to Peer Reviewer Comments
A response to reviewers (or 'revision letter') is a formal document that authors submit alongside a revised manuscript, addressing each reviewer comment point-by-point. The response letter shows the editor and reviewers that you have carefully considered their feedback, explained changes made in light of their suggestions, and justified any points of disagreement. A thoughtful, respectful response to reviewers significantly increases the likelihood of acceptance; a dismissive or defensive response can lead to rejection despite good science. The response letter is not an argument but a demonstration of engagement, transparency, and scientific integrity.
Record di origine
Citazioni copiate testualmente dal record di origine del metodo. Non si inferisce alcuna verifica a livello di affermazione da esse.
- Clydesdale, G. J., Seymour, K. J., & Toy, M. S. (2013). How to write a response to reviewers. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 97(1), 1–2. · URL
- Wager, E., & Wieland, B. (2011). Responsibilities of journal editors. Lancet, 337(9834), 1807–1809. · URL
- International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (2023). Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals. · URL
Affermazioni curate
Affermazioni persistite nel registro delle evidenze, ciascuna con la propria valutazione.
Questa vista non inventa una valutazione dell'affermazione quando il registro non ne ha.
Metodi correlati
Generato dal grafo dei metodi e mostrato come relazioni suggerite dalla macchina — nessuna affermazione di evidenza viene inferita.