ScholarGate
Asisten
Process / pipelineSurvey / expert elicitation

Policy Delphi

The policy Delphi is a structured, iterative technique for eliciting and organising informed opinion on contested policy issues. Unlike the classical Delphi, which seeks consensus on a forecast, the policy Delphi is explicitly designed to generate the strongest possible opposing positions on a policy question and to expose the full range of options, supporting arguments and disagreements among a panel of knowledgeable stakeholders. Introduced by Murray Turoff in 1970, it conducts several anonymous rounds in which participants rate policy statements on dimensions such as desirability and feasibility, see aggregated feedback and the reasoning behind divergent views, and revise their positions — surfacing structured intelligence for decision-makers rather than a forced agreement.

Buka di MethodMindSegeraTerapkan, bandingkan, dapatkan panduan
Alat & sumber daya
Unduh salindia
Belajar & jelajahi
VideoSegera

Baca metode selengkapnya

Khusus anggota

Masuk dengan akun gratis untuk membaca bagian ini.

Masuk

Peta metode

Lingkup metode terkait — pilih sebuah simpul untuk menjelajah.

Sumber

  1. Turoff, M. (1970). The design of a policy Delphi. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2(2), 149–171. DOI: 10.1016/0040-1625(70)90161-7
  2. Linstone, H. A., & Turoff, M. (Eds.) (1975). The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. ISBN: 9780201042948

Cara menyitasi halaman ini

ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Policy Delphi Method for Structured Expert Deliberation. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/id/public-policy/policy-delphi

Metode yang mana?

Letakkan metode ini berdampingan dengan kerabat terdekatnya dan baca secara bersisian — pustaka menata bukunya di atas meja; pilihan ada di tangan Anda.

Bandingkan berdampingan

Dirujuk oleh

ScholarGatePolicy Delphi (Policy Delphi Method for Structured Expert Deliberation). Diakses 2026-06-24 dari https://scholargate.app/id/public-policy/policy-delphi · Set data: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026