ScholarGate

Jelajahi

Perpustakaan Perpustakaan saya Meja Pemeriksaan Awal Review Studio Asisten

Ruang kerja

Bangun rak buku Anda

Simpan metode, susun koleksi, dan bawa semuanya ke meja Anda.

Perpustakaan

/ Jelajahi

Perpustakaan

Jelajahi sains berdasarkan metode, bidang, dan bukti.

Satu katalog metode penelitian — pelajari cara kerja tiap metode, kapan menggunakannya, dan apa yang tidak bisa dilakukannya.

6,529 metode11 bidang7 rumpun metode40 bahasa

Atlas sainsPetakan struktur sains sebelum Anda menggunakannya.Bidang · metode · jalur buktiJelajahi peta

BidangHealth & Medicine716 Psychology570 Business & Finance410 Engineering330 Life Sciences263 Education261 Research Practice

Perpustakaan rujukan berbasis konten untuk metode penelitian — apa itu setiap metode, bagaimana cara kerjanya, dan dari mana asalnya.

Data terbuka (CC-BY)

Jelajahi

Perpustakaan
Cari metode…
Jelajahi per bidang
Bidang
Perjalanan
Bandingkan
Metode yang mana?

Referensi

Bidang
Atlas
Glosarium
Metodologi
Filosofi

Ruang kerja

Perpustakaan saya
Meja
Obrolan

Perusahaan

Tentang
Harga
Kontak
Usulkan metode

Entri dihimpun dari sumber yang telah diterbitkan sebagai rujukan. Memverifikasi keakuratan dan kesesuaian setiap informasi untuk penggunaan Anda sendiri tetap menjadi tanggung jawab Anda.

© 2026 ScholarGate · Perpustakaan rujukan metode penelitian

Privasi
Kuki
Ketentuan
Hapus akun

248

Natural Sciences236

Social Sciences185

Environment & Sustainability160

MetodeStatistika1,836 AI & ML1,661 Ilmu Keputusan932 Metode Penelitian1,354 Pengukuran1,745 Kausal & Bukti532 Praktik Penelitian118

8 metode di Law · Metode PenelitianBersihkan

Metode di persimpangan dua filter Anda.

UrutkanPopularitas A–Z Z–A Terbaru

Case Law Analysis

Case law analysis is a systematic method for examining judicial decisions to identify binding legal rules, evolving doctrines, and interpretive trends. Rooted in the common law tradition of stare decisis, it requires the researcher to locate the ratio decidendi — the binding reasoning — of each decision, distinguish it

Comparative Doctrinal Legal Research

Comparative doctrinal legal research systematically identifies, expounds, and compares the legal rules, principles, and doctrines governing the same problem across two or more jurisdictions. It combines the internal rigour of doctrinal analysis — mapping the authoritative sources of a single legal system — with the ext

Comparative Legal Analysis

Comparative legal analysis is a structured research method that examines how two or more legal systems — whether national, regional, or supranational — address a common legal problem. By placing rules, doctrines, and judicial decisions side by side, researchers identify convergences, divergences, and the underlying soc

Critical Case Law Analysis

Critical case law analysis applies the theoretical tools of Critical Legal Studies (CLS) to the examination of judicial decisions. Rather than accepting legal reasoning at face value, this approach interrogates how courts construct legal arguments, whose interests those arguments serve, and how ideological commitments

Critical Doctrinal Legal Research

Critical doctrinal legal research combines traditional black-letter legal analysis — systematically mapping the rules, principles, and doctrines found in statutes and case law — with the evaluative lens of critical legal theory. Rather than treating legal doctrine as a neutral or self-contained system, it interrogates

Evaluation-focused legal content analysis

Evaluation-focused legal content analysis is a systematic method for examining legal texts — statutes, regulations, court decisions, contracts, or policy documents — with an explicit evaluative purpose: to assess whether and how well legal instruments achieve specified goals, standards, or values. It combines the struc

Legal Content Analysis

Legal content analysis applies the systematic procedures of content analysis to legal texts — statutes, regulations, judicial opinions, treaties, and legal commentaries — in order to identify patterns, themes, and trends across a corpus of legal material. It bridges qualitative legal scholarship and quantitative social

Longitudinal comparative legal analysis

Longitudinal comparative legal analysis examines how legal rules, doctrines, or institutions develop and diverge across two or more legal systems over an extended period. By combining the spatial dimension of comparative law with the temporal dimension of longitudinal research, it captures not just differences between