Bandingkan metode
Tinjau metode pilihan Anda berdampingan; baris yang berbeda akan disorot.
| Weighted Quota Sampling× | Penarikan Sampel Berbobot× | |
|---|---|---|
| Bidang | Metodologi Survei | Metodologi Survei |
| Keluarga | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Tahun asal≠ | Mid-to-late 20th century | 1940s–1952 (formalized in large-scale government survey work and the Horvitz-Thompson estimator) |
| Pencetus≠ | Derived from quota sampling (mid-20th century market research) combined with survey weighting theory (Kalton, 1983) | Morris H. Hansen, William N. Hurwitz; D. G. Horvitz and D. J. Thompson (theoretical framework) |
| Tipe≠ | Non-probability sampling with post-collection weight adjustment | Probability sampling design |
| Sumber perintis≠ | Kalton, G. (1983). Introduction to Survey Sampling. Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-0803921290 | Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling Techniques (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons. ISBN: 978-0471162407 |
| Alias | quota sampling with weighting, weighted quota survey, post-weighted quota sampling, quota sample weighting | probability proportional to size sampling, PPS sampling, unequal probability sampling, importance sampling |
| Terkait≠ | 5 | 6 |
| Ringkasan≠ | Weighted quota sampling combines quota sampling — recruiting a set number of respondents matching pre-specified demographic cells — with post-collection statistical weighting that adjusts each respondent's contribution to match known population proportions. The result is a non-probability design with a bias-correction mechanism, widely used in market research, political polling, and applied social surveys when probability sampling is impractical but representativeness remains a goal. | Weighted sampling is a probability-based design in which units are selected with unequal probabilities proportional to a known auxiliary measure of size or importance. Sampling weights — the inverse of inclusion probabilities — are applied during analysis so that each sampled unit correctly represents the population units it stands for. The approach underpins large-scale government, health, and social surveys where simple random sampling would be inefficient. |
| ScholarGateSet data ↗ |
|
|