ScholarGate
Asisten

Bandingkan metode

Tinjau metode pilihan Anda berdampingan; baris yang berbeda akan disorot.

F1-tertimbang×F1-mikro×
BidangEvaluasi ModelEvaluasi Model
KeluargaMCDMMCDM
Tahun asal2000s2000s
PencetusMulti-class evaluation communityMulti-class evaluation community
TipeEvaluation metricEvaluation metric
Sumber perintisPowers, D. M. (2011). Evaluation: From Precision, Recall and F-Measure to ROC, Informedness, Markedness and Correlation. Journal of Machine Learning Technologies, 2(1), 37-63. link ↗Powers, D. M. (2011). Evaluation: From Precision, Recall and F-Measure to ROC, Informedness, Markedness and Correlation. Journal of Machine Learning Technologies, 2(1), 37-63. link ↗
AliasSupport-weighted F1Micro F1, Frequency-weighted average F1
Terkait34
RingkasanWeighted F1 computes the F1-score for each class and then takes a weighted average, where weights are proportional to the number of samples in each class (support). It provides a middle ground between macro and micro-averaging.Micro-averaged F1 computes the F1-score by aggregating true positives, false positives, and false negatives across all classes, then calculating a single metric. It is equivalent to accuracy in multi-class classification and is useful when class distributions reflect their natural importance.
ScholarGateSet data
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sumber
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sumber
  3. PUBLISHED

Ke halaman pencarian Unduh salindia

ScholarGateBandingkan metode: Weighted F1 · Micro-averaged F1. Diakses 2026-06-19 dari https://scholargate.app/id/compare