ScholarGate
Asisten

Bandingkan metode

Tinjau metode pilihan Anda berdampingan; baris yang berbeda akan disorot.

Tinjauan Literatur Sistematis Berbasis Irisan Waktu×Pemetaan Sains×
BidangSaintometrikaBibliometrika
KeluargaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Tahun asal2010s2000s
PencetusAdapted from systematic review methodology; temporal segmentation formalized in bibliometric practice (Zupic & Cater, 2015; Aria & Cuccurullo, 2017)Katy Börner, Chaomei Chen, and others
TipeSystematic review variant with temporal segmentationMethod
Sumber perintisZupic, I., & Cater, T. (2015). Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472. DOI ↗Börner, K., Chen, C., & Boyack, K. W. (2003). Visualizing knowledge domains. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 37, 179–255. DOI ↗
Aliastemporal systematic review, period-based systematic review, chronological systematic review, time-segmented literature reviewknowledge mapping, domain mapping, research landscape visualization
Terkait55
RingkasanA time-sliced systematic literature review applies the rigorous search, screening, and synthesis protocol of a standard systematic review while dividing the retrieved corpus into discrete temporal periods — time slices — and analyzing each period separately. This design reveals how a research field has developed across time: which topics emerged, grew, or declined; how key authors and journals shifted; and how intellectual structures evolved from one era to the next.Science mapping is a bibliometric visualization method that creates visual representations of research domains, showing the structure, development, and relationships of scientific fields. Using bibliographic data (citations, keywords, authors, journals), science mapping algorithms generate network diagrams where nodes represent documents, concepts, or authors and edges represent relationships (citation, collaboration, semantic similarity). The resulting maps make invisible intellectual structures visible, enabling researchers to understand field topology, identify emerging areas, and navigate disciplinary landscapes. Pioneered by Börner, Chen, and Boyack in the 2000s, science mapping has become a standard tool in research evaluation and strategic planning.
ScholarGateSet data
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sumber
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sumber
  3. PUBLISHED

Ke halaman pencarian Unduh salindia

ScholarGateBandingkan metode: Time-sliced Systematic literature review · Science Mapping. Diakses 2026-06-19 dari https://scholargate.app/id/compare