Bandingkan metode
Tinjau metode pilihan Anda berdampingan; baris yang berbeda akan disorot.
| Analisis Sitasi Berbasis Irisan Waktu× | Analisis Penggandengan Bibliografis× | |
|---|---|---|
| Bidang≠ | Saintometrika | Bibliometrika |
| Keluarga | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Tahun asal≠ | 1955–1965 (foundational); temporal slicing formalized in scientometrics from the 1980s onward | 1963 |
| Pencetus≠ | Eugene Garfield (citation analysis foundation); Derek J. de Solla Price (temporal/longitudinal framing) | Melvin M. Kessler |
| Tipe≠ | Quantitative scientometric technique | Method |
| Sumber perintis≠ | Garfield, E. (1955). Citation indexes for science: A new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. Science, 122(3159), 108–111. DOI ↗ | Kessler, M. M. (1963). Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. American Documentation, 14(3), 123–131. DOI ↗ |
| Alias≠ | temporal citation analysis, longitudinal citation analysis, time-window citation analysis, diachronic citation analysis | document coupling, bibliographic similarity |
| Terkait≠ | 6 | 5 |
| Ringkasan≠ | Time-sliced citation analysis partitions a body of literature into sequential temporal windows — for example, five-year intervals — and performs citation analysis within and across each window. This reveals how citation patterns, influential papers, and knowledge flows shift over time, providing a dynamic picture of a field's intellectual evolution rather than a static aggregate snapshot. | Bibliographic coupling is a method that identifies intellectual relationships between documents by measuring their shared references. Two papers are considered 'coupled' when they cite the same sources, indicating they address related research questions or draw from the same conceptual foundations. Introduced by Kessler in 1963, this approach enables researchers to map knowledge domains and discover thematically similar publications without relying on subject cataloging or keywords. |
| ScholarGateSet data ↗ |
|
|