ScholarGate
Asisten

Bandingkan metode

Tinjau metode pilihan Anda berdampingan; baris yang berbeda akan disorot.

Kerangka Kerja Domain Teoretis (TDF)×Kerangka Kerja Terpadu untuk Riset Implementasi (CFIR)×
BidangIlmu ImplementasiIlmu Implementasi
KeluargaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Tahun asal20052009
PencetusMichie, S., Johnston, M., Abraham, C., et al.Damschroder, L. J., Aron, D. C., et al.
TipeFrameworkFramework
Sumber perintisMichie, S., Johnston, M., Abraham, C., Lawton, R., Parker, D., & Walker, A. (2005). Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice: A consensus approach. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 14(1), 26-33. DOI ↗Damschroder, L. J., Aron, D. C., Keith, R. E., Kirsh, S. R., Alexander, J. A., & Lowson, E. (2009). Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implementation Science, 4, 50. DOI ↗
AliasTDF, theoretical domains, behaviour change frameworkCFIR, CFIR model, consolidated framework
Terkait55
RingkasanThe Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) is a 14-domain model that integrates constructs from 33 behavior change and implementation theories to identify barriers and facilitators to professional and public behavior change. Developed by Michie et al. (2005) to provide a practical tool for implementation scientists and behavior change specialists, the TDF helps systematically assess 'why' healthcare professionals or patients do (or do not) adopt evidence-based practices, and guides the design of tailored behavior change interventions.The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) is a five-domain model designed to systematically evaluate the factors influencing implementation success of evidence-based interventions in health systems. Developed by Damschroder et al. (2009) and refined through extensive use across health domains, CFIR provides a structured vocabulary and taxonomy of 39 constructs that identify implementation barriers and facilitators across intervention characteristics, organizational context, individual factors, and implementation process.
ScholarGateSet data
  1. v1
  2. 3 Sumber
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Sumber
  3. PUBLISHED

Ke halaman pencarian Unduh salindia

ScholarGateBandingkan metode: Theoretical Domains Framework · Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Diakses 2026-06-17 dari https://scholargate.app/id/compare