Bandingkan metode
Tinjau metode pilihan Anda berdampingan; baris yang berbeda akan disorot.
| SWARA II× | Analisis Rasio Penilaian Bobot Bertahap× | |
|---|---|---|
| Bidang | Pengambilan Keputusan | Pengambilan Keputusan |
| Keluarga | MCDM | MCDM |
| Tahun asal | 2010 | 2010 |
| Pencetus≠ | Keršuliene, Zavadskas, and Turskis; extended by Zolfani et al. | Keršulienė, V., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. |
| Tipe≠ | Expert-based stepwise weight derivation with ratio refinement | Sequential step-ratio subjective weighting |
| Sumber perintis≠ | Keršuliene, V., Zavadskas, E. K., & Turskis, Z. (2010). Selection of rational dispute resolution method by evaluating opposing parties' interest in civil litigation. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 16(3), 412-422. link ↗ | Keršulienė, V., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. (2010). Selection of rational dispute resolution method by applying new step-wise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA). Journal of Business Economics and Management DOI ↗ |
| Alias≠ | SWARA II, SWARA 2 | — |
| Terkait≠ | 4 | 8 |
| Ringkasan≠ | SWARA II (Step-wise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis - Improved) is an enhanced variant of the SWARA method for deriving criterion weights from expert assessments. Instead of requiring pairwise comparisons or absolute weight assignments, SWARA II asks experts to rank criteria, then assess the relative importance of each criterion compared to the next-ranked one. Improved variants enhance robustness and interpretability of weight derivation. | SWARA (Step-Wise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Keršulienė, V., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateSet data ↗ |
|
|