Bandingkan metode
Tinjau metode pilihan Anda berdampingan; baris yang berbeda akan disorot.
| Soldier Adaptation Measure (SAM)× | Skala Identitas Militer (SIM)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Bidang | Psikologi Militer | Psikologi Militer |
| Keluarga | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Tahun asal | 2007 | 2007 |
| Pencetus≠ | Bliese, Wright, Adler, Thomas, & Hoge | Military psychology researchers; identity theory |
| Tipe | Self-report | Self-report |
| Sumber perintis≠ | Bliese, P. D., Wright, K. M., Adler, A. B., Thomas, J. L., & Hoge, C. W. (2007). Validating the Primary Care PTSD Screen in military and veteran populations. Psychological Assessment, 19(2), 176-180. link ↗ | Cabrera, O. A., Hoge, C. W., Bliese, P. D., Castro, C. A., & Messer, S. C. (2007). Childhood adversity and combat as predictors of depression and post-traumatic stress in deployed troops. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 33(4), 250-256. DOI ↗ |
| Alias | SAM | MIS |
| Terkait | 4 | 4 |
| Ringkasan≠ | The Soldier Adaptation Measure is a brief self-report instrument assessing psychological readiness and adaptation to military deployment. Developed by Bliese and colleagues in the context of military mental health surveillance, it measures dimensions of military motivation, unit cohesion, perceived leadership, and psychological well-being during deployment. It is used in pre-deployment, mid-deployment, and post-deployment screening to identify service members struggling with psychological adjustment and to inform unit support and individual intervention. | The Military Identity Scale measures the extent to which a service member's self-concept and life meaning are organized around military role and identity. While no single standardized MIS exists, military psychology researchers have developed identity measures assessing how strongly military identity is internalized, influencing both in-service adjustment and post-deployment civilian reintegration. These scales examine the degree to which individuals identify with military values, roles, and belonging, with implications for both operational resilience and civilian transition outcomes. |
| ScholarGateSet data ↗ |
|
|