Bandingkan metode
Tinjau metode pilihan Anda berdampingan; baris yang berbeda akan disorot.
| Saturasi Data dalam Penelitian Kualitatif× | Metodologi Kelompok Diskusi Terpumpun× | |
|---|---|---|
| Bidang | Penelitian Kualitatif | Penelitian Kualitatif |
| Keluarga | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Tahun asal≠ | 1967 | 1956 |
| Pencetus≠ | Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss | Robert K. Merton and Paul F. Lazarsfeld |
| Tipe≠ | Concept | Method |
| Sumber perintis≠ | Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine. ISBN: 978-0202302560 | Krueger, R. A. (1994). Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research. SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-0803954366 |
| Alias≠ | saturation, theoretical saturation, thematic saturation, sampling to saturation | FGD, focus group discussion, group interview |
| Terkait | 4 | 4 |
| Ringkasan≠ | Data saturation is a foundational principle in qualitative research describing the point at which data collection yields no new themes, codes, or insights—additional data becomes redundant. Introduced by Glaser and Strauss (1967) in their work on grounded theory, saturation guides decisions about sample size and when to stop recruiting participants. Saturation is not a fixed number but a dynamic endpoint determined by examining whether new data are adding substantively new information. The concept is central to claims of rigor and theoretical adequacy in qualitative research, signaling that the researcher has gathered sufficient data to understand the phenomenon in depth. | Focus group discussions are a qualitative research method in which a trained moderator guides a small group (typically 6–12 participants) through structured or semi-structured discussion of a specific topic or product. Developed by Merton and Lazarsfeld in the 1950s for market research, focus groups are now widely used in health sciences, education, social sciences, and policy research. The method leverages group interaction to generate rich, contextual insights that individual interviews may not reveal. |
| ScholarGateSet data ↗ |
|
|