ScholarGate
Asisten

Bandingkan metode

Tinjau metode pilihan Anda berdampingan; baris yang berbeda akan disorot.

Responsible Research and Innovation Assessment×Constructive Technology Assessment×
BidangScience Technology StudiesScience Technology Studies
KeluargaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Tahun asal20131995
PencetusJack Stilgoe, Richard Owen, Phil MacnaghtenArie Rip & Johan Schot (Dutch CTA tradition)
TipeNormative governance and reflexive-assessment processCo-evolutionary technology-shaping process
Sumber perintisStilgoe, J., Owen, R., & Macnaghten, P. (2013). Developing a framework for responsible innovation. Research Policy, 42(9), 1568-1580. DOI ↗Schot, J., & Rip, A. (1997). The past and future of constructive technology assessment. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 54(2-3), 251-268. DOI ↗
AliasRRI assessment, Responsible innovation framework, AIRR assessmentCTA, Constructive TA, Co-evolutionary technology assessment
Terkait44
RingkasanResponsible Research and Innovation (RRI) assessment is an approach to governing science and innovation that asks not only whether a technology works but whether it is desirable, and seeks to align research and innovation with the values, needs, and expectations of society. The influential Stilgoe-Owen-Macnaghten framework operationalises this through four dimensions—anticipation, reflexivity, inclusion, and responsiveness (AIRR)—that are built into the innovation process so that direction and purpose, not just risk and product, become objects of deliberate care.Constructive Technology Assessment (CTA) is an approach to assessing technology that seeks to influence its design and development, not merely to forecast its impacts after the fact. By broadening the design process to feed societal aspects back to engineers and decision-makers early—while the technology is still malleable—CTA aims to manage the co-evolution of technology and society and to soften the Collingridge dilemma, the bind in which a technology's effects are easy to change before they are known and hard to change once they are.
ScholarGateSet data
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sumber
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sumber
  3. PUBLISHED

Ke halaman pencarian Unduh salindia

ScholarGateBandingkan metode: Responsible Research and Innovation Assessment · Constructive Technology Assessment. Diakses 2026-06-25 dari https://scholargate.app/id/compare