Bandingkan metode

	Desain Metode Campuran Pragmatis Dominan Kuantitatif	Desain Metode Campuran Prioritas Kuantitatif
Bidang	Desain Penelitian	Desain Penelitian
Keluarga	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Tahun asal	1998–2010	2003–2009
Pencetus	Tashakkori & Teddlie (mixed methods paradigm discourse); pragmatic strand systematized by Morgan and Creswell	Creswell & Plano Clark; Teddlie & Tashakkori
Tipe	Mixed methods research design	Mixed methods research design
Sumber perintis	Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (Eds.). (2010). SAGE Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-1412972666	Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1483344379
Alias	QUAN-dominant pragmatic MMR, pragmatic quantitative-priority mixed design, quan-priority pragmatic design	QUAN-dominant mixed methods, quantitative-dominant mixed methods, quan-priority design, quantitative-first mixed methods
Terkait	6	6
Ringkasan	A mixed methods design in which quantitative data and analysis carry the primary explanatory weight while a smaller qualitative component provides contextual depth. Grounded in philosophical pragmatism, design decisions — including timing, sequencing, and the scope of each strand — are driven by what best answers the research question rather than by adherence to a single paradigmatic tradition.	Quantitative-priority mixed methods design is a research approach in which quantitative data and analysis carry the primary explanatory weight, while qualitative data play a supplementary or corroborating role. The researcher collects and analyzes quantitative data first (or concurrently with greater emphasis), then uses qualitative findings to elaborate, explain, or contextualize the statistical results. Priority and sequence together define where integration occurs and how each strand informs the other.