Bandingkan metode
Tinjau metode pilihan Anda berdampingan; baris yang berbeda akan disorot.
| PROMETHEE VI× | PROMETHEE I× | |
|---|---|---|
| Bidang | Pengambilan Keputusan | Pengambilan Keputusan |
| Keluarga | MCDM | MCDM |
| Tahun asal≠ | 1995 | 1986 |
| Pencetus≠ | Brans, J. P. Mareschal, B. | Brans, J. P., Vincke, P., Mareschal, B. |
| Tipe≠ | Sensitivity analysis of PROMETHEE rankings across all feasible weight combinations | Outranking via positive/negative flows (partial preorder) |
| Sumber perintis≠ | Brans, J. P., Mareschal, B. (1995). The PROMETHEE VI procedure: how to differentiate hard from soft multicriteria problems. Journal of Decision Systems DOI ↗ | Brans, J. P., Vincke, P., Mareschal, B. (1986). How to select and how to rank projects: The PROMETHEE method. European Journal of Operational Research DOI ↗ |
| Alias | — | — |
| Terkait≠ | 2 | 8 |
| Ringkasan≠ | PROMETHEE-VI (PROMETHEE VI — Walking Weights Sensitivity) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Brans, J. P. Mareschal, B. in 1995. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | PROMETHEE-I (PROMETHEE I — Preference Ranking Organisation METHod for Enrichment Evaluations I (partial ranking)) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Brans, J. P., Vincke, P., Mareschal, B. in 1986. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateSet data ↗ |
|
|