Bandingkan metode
Tinjau metode pilihan Anda berdampingan; baris yang berbeda akan disorot.
| Skala Ideologi Politik× | Skala Kebutuhan Kognisi dalam Politik× | |
|---|---|---|
| Bidang | Psikologi Politik | Psikologi Politik |
| Keluarga | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Tahun asal≠ | 1990 | 1982 |
| Pencetus≠ | Hans-Dieter Klingemann & Norberto Bobbio | John T. Cacioppo & Richard E. Petty |
| Tipe | Self-report | Self-report |
| Sumber perintis≠ | Fuchs, D., & Klingemann, H. D. (1990). The left-right schema. In M. Kent Jennings & Jan W. Van Deth (Eds.), Continuities in political action. Berlin: De Gruyter. link ↗ | Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42(1), 116-131. DOI ↗ |
| Alias≠ | Left-Right Scale, Ideology Continuum, Political Spectrum Scale | NFC-P, Political Need for Cognition |
| Terkait | 3 | 3 |
| Ringkasan≠ | The Political Ideology Scale measures individual self-placement on a left-right political spectrum, capturing fundamental preferences for government role, economic organization, and social values. The single-item self-placement measure (most common) asks respondents to rate themselves on a 0-10 or 0-100 continuum; multi-item versions assess distinct ideological dimensions (economic policy, social policy, nationalism). The left-right axis remains the dominant organizing principle of political competition globally, predicting party choice, policy preferences, and electoral behavior despite critiques that it oversimplifies multidimensional political space. | The Need for Cognition in Politics Scale measures individual differences in the tendency to engage in and enjoy effortful cognitive processing related to political information and decision-making. Originally conceptualized by Cacioppo and Petty (1982), the trait reflects whether individuals seek, process, and rely on substantive information when forming political attitudes. High NFC individuals prefer detailed policy discussions; low NFC individuals may rely on heuristics, endorsements, or emotional appeals. |
| ScholarGateSet data ↗ |
|
|