Bandingkan metode
Tinjau metode pilihan Anda berdampingan; baris yang berbeda akan disorot.
| Analisis Faktor Konfirmatori Ordinal× | Analisis Faktor Eksploratori (EFA)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Bidang≠ | Psikometri | Statistika |
| Keluarga | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| Tahun asal≠ | 1984 | — |
| Pencetus≠ | Bengt O. Muthén | — |
| Tipe≠ | Latent variable / structural | Latent variable / dimension reduction |
| Sumber perintis≠ | Flora, D. B. & Curran, P. J. (2004). An empirical evaluation of alternative methods of estimation for confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data. Psychological Methods, 9(4), 466–491. DOI ↗ | Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C. & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4(3), 272–299. DOI ↗ |
| Alias≠ | CFA for ordinal data, polychoric CFA, WLSMV CFA, categorical CFA | common factor analysis, açımlayıcı faktör analizi, factor analysis |
| Terkait≠ | 5 | 4 |
| Ringkasan≠ | Ordinal confirmatory factor analysis (Ordinal CFA) tests a pre-specified factor structure when the observed indicators are ordinal — typically Likert-type survey items. By using polychoric correlations and robust estimators such as WLSMV, it avoids the bias that arises from treating categorical responses as continuous. | Exploratory factor analysis reduces a large set of observed variables into a smaller number of latent common factors. It is widely used in scale development and psychometrics to uncover the dimensional structure that underlies a set of correlated items, without specifying that structure in advance. |
| ScholarGateSet data ↗ |
|
|