ScholarGate
Asisten

Bandingkan metode

Tinjau metode pilihan Anda berdampingan; baris yang berbeda akan disorot.

Analisis Meta Jaringan×Analisis Bias Publikasi×
BidangSintesis BuktiMeta-Analisis
KeluargaProcess / pipelineHypothesis test
Tahun asal20021997
PencetusLumley (2002)Matthias Egger et al.
TipeMethodDiagnostic bias test for meta-analysis
Sumber perintisLumley, T. (2002). Network meta-analysis for indirect treatment comparisons. Statistics in Medicine, 21(16), 2313–2324. DOI ↗Egger, M., Davey Smith, G., Schneider, M., & Minder, C. (1997). Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ, 315(7109), 629–634. DOI ↗
AliasMixed Treatment Comparison, MTC, Indirect Comparison Meta-AnalysisSmall-Study Effects Test, Funnel Plot Asymmetry Test, Egger Regression Test, Yayın Yanlılığı Analizi
Terkait11
RingkasanNetwork meta-analysis (NMA) is a systematic method for comparing multiple interventions simultaneously within a single analytical framework, incorporating both direct evidence (head-to-head trials) and indirect evidence (comparisons via common comparators). First formalized by Lumley in 2002, NMA allows researchers to rank treatments and quantify comparative effectiveness even when some treatment pairs have never been directly studied.Publication bias analysis examines whether the set of studies included in a meta-analysis is a representative sample of all conducted research, or whether studies with non-significant or unfavorable results have been systematically suppressed. Matthias Egger and colleagues introduced the regression-based funnel plot asymmetry test in 1997, providing a formal statistical complement to the graphical funnel plot inspection long used in evidence synthesis.
ScholarGateSet data
  1. v1
  2. 3 Sumber
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Sumber
  3. PUBLISHED

Ke halaman pencarian Unduh salindia

ScholarGateBandingkan metode: Network Meta-Analysis · Publication Bias Analysis. Diakses 2026-06-18 dari https://scholargate.app/id/compare