ScholarGate
Asisten

Bandingkan metode

Tinjau metode pilihan Anda berdampingan; baris yang berbeda akan disorot.

Wawancara Mendalam Multi-Sumber×Fokus Grup Multi-Sumber×
BidangMetodologi SurveiMetodologi Survei
KeluargaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Tahun asal1980s–1990s (formalized in qualitative inquiry literature)1980s–1990s
PencetusGrounded in qualitative traditions consolidated by Patton, Lincoln & Guba, and othersDeveloped from focus group methodology; formalized in applied social research (Krueger, Morgan, and colleagues)
TipeQualitative data collection techniqueQualitative data collection technique
Sumber perintisPatton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.). Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-0761919711Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2015). Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research (5th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1483365244
Aliasmulti-informant in-depth interview, multi-perspective qualitative interview, multiple-source IDI, multi-stakeholder in-depth interviewmulti-stakeholder focus group, multiple-source focus group, cross-source focus group, MSFG
Terkait54
RingkasanThe multi-source in-depth interview is a qualitative data collection strategy in which extended, open-ended interviews are conducted with participants drawn from two or more distinct source groups — such as providers and clients, managers and staff, or experts and laypeople. Collecting data across diverse informant positions enriches description and enables the researcher to examine a phenomenon from multiple vantage points within a single study.The multi-source focus group method extends the standard focus group design by deliberately recruiting participants from two or more distinct stakeholder groups — for example, clinicians and patients, teachers and students, or managers and frontline staff. Separate sessions are held for each source group using a shared discussion protocol, and the resulting data are analyzed both within each group and across groups to reveal convergences, tensions, and perspectives that no single-source design could uncover.
ScholarGateSet data
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sumber
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sumber
  3. PUBLISHED

Ke halaman pencarian Unduh salindia

ScholarGateBandingkan metode: Multi-source In-depth Interview · Multi-source Focus Group. Diakses 2026-06-15 dari https://scholargate.app/id/compare