ScholarGate
Asisten

Bandingkan metode

Tinjau metode pilihan Anda berdampingan; baris yang berbeda akan disorot.

Perluasan Hesitant Fuzzy m-Polar dari TOPSIS×Metode Terbaik-Terburuk×
BidangPengambilan KeputusanPengambilan Keputusan
KeluargaMCDMMCDM
Tahun asal20192015
PencetusAkram, M., Adeel, A., Alcantud, J.C.R.Rezaei, J.
Tipem-Polar Hesitant outranking/ranking — m-Polar Hesitant Fuzzy Element (mHFE: m-tuple of HFEs, ℏ_m: Z → P([0,1]^m))Pairwise comparison (best-to-others + others-to-worst vectors), LP
Sumber perintisAkram, M., Adeel, A., Alcantud, J.C.R. (2019). Multi-Criteria Group Decision-Making Using an m-Polar Hesitant Fuzzy TOPSIS Approach. Symmetry DOI ↗Rezaei, J. (2015). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega DOI ↗
Alias
Terkait88
RingkasanMHF-TOPSIS (m-Polar Hesitant Fuzzy extension of TOPSIS) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Akram, M., Adeel, A., Alcantud, J.C.R. in 2019. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.BWM (Best-Worst Method) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Rezaei, J. in 2015. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateSet data
  1. v1
  2. 1 Sumber
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Sumber
  3. PUBLISHED

Ke halaman pencarian Unduh salindia

ScholarGateBandingkan metode: MHF-TOPSIS · BWM. Diakses 2026-06-19 dari https://scholargate.app/id/compare