ScholarGate
Asisten

Bandingkan metode

Tinjau metode pilihan Anda berdampingan; baris yang berbeda akan disorot.

Metode Pencocokan (CEM / Optimal / Genetik)×Efek Perlakuan Rata-rata Lokal (LATE / CACE)×
BidangInferensi KausalInferensi Kausal
KeluargaRegression modelRegression model
Tahun asal20121994
PencetusIacus, King & Porro (CEM); Hansen (optimal/full matching)Imbens & Angrist (1994); Angrist, Imbens & Rubin (1996)
TipeMatching for causal inferenceInstrumental-variable causal estimand
Sumber perintisIacus, S. M., King, G., & Porro, G. (2012). Causal Inference without Balance Checking: Coarsened Exact Matching. Political Analysis, 20(1), 1-24. DOI ↗Imbens, G. W., & Angrist, J. D. (1994). Identification and Estimation of Local Average Treatment Effects. Econometrica, 62(2), 467-475. DOI ↗
Aliascoarsened exact matching, optimal matching, genetic matching, CEMLATE, CACE, complier average causal effect, Yerel Ortalama Tedavi Etkisi (LATE / CACE)
Terkait55
RingkasanMatching Methods are a family of causal-inference techniques beyond propensity-score matching that pair treated and control units with similar covariates so that a treatment effect can be read off the balanced sample. The family includes Coarsened Exact Matching (Iacus, King & Porro, 2012), optimal matching, and genetic matching.The Local Average Treatment Effect is an instrumental-variable estimand, introduced by Imbens and Angrist (1994) and formalised with Rubin (1996), that recovers the average treatment effect for the subpopulation of compliers — units whose treatment status is actually moved by the instrument. It is closely tied to compliance analysis.
ScholarGateSet data
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sumber
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sumber
  3. PUBLISHED

Ke halaman pencarian Unduh salindia

ScholarGateBandingkan metode: Matching Methods · Local Average Treatment Effect. Diakses 2026-06-17 dari https://scholargate.app/id/compare