ScholarGate
Asisten

Bandingkan metode

Tinjau metode pilihan Anda berdampingan; baris yang berbeda akan disorot.

Studi Epidemiologi Cross-Sectional yang Dicocokkan×Studi Kohort yang Dicocokkan×
BidangEpidemiologiEpidemiologi
KeluargaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Tahun asalMid-to-late 20th century (formalized ~1970s–1990s)Mid-20th century; propensity-score variant 1983
PencetusDeveloped within the tradition of observational epidemiology; matching principles codified by Greenland, Rothman, and Kelsey in modern epidemiology textsEstablished practice; propensity-score matching formalized by Rosenbaum & Rubin (1983)
TipeObservational epidemiological study designObservational analytic study design
Sumber perintisRothman, K. J., Greenland, S., & Lash, T. L. (2008). Modern Epidemiology (3rd ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. ISBN: 978-0781755641Rothman, K. J., Greenland, S., & Lash, T. L. (2008). Modern Epidemiology (3rd ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. ISBN: 978-0781755641
Aliasmatched cross-sectional survey, matched prevalence study, matched cross-sectional design, frequency-matched cross-sectional studymatched follow-up study, paired cohort study, propensity-matched cohort, matched prospective study
Terkait55
RingkasanA matched cross-sectional epidemiological study is an observational design that measures exposure and outcome simultaneously in a population sample while applying matching to control for one or more confounding variables. By pairing or grouping participants on key characteristics such as age, sex, or socioeconomic status before or during analysis, the design reduces confounding bias without requiring longitudinal follow-up, making it efficient for estimating prevalence and cross-sectional associations.A matched cohort study is an observational design in which each exposed participant is paired with one or more unexposed counterparts who share key characteristics — such as age, sex, or comorbidity status — before both groups are followed forward in time to compare incident outcomes. Matching controls for measured confounders at the design stage, reducing bias that would otherwise require statistical adjustment alone.
ScholarGateSet data
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sumber
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sumber
  3. PUBLISHED

Ke halaman pencarian Unduh salindia

ScholarGateBandingkan metode: Matched Cross-Sectional Epidemiological Study · Matched Cohort Study. Diakses 2026-06-18 dari https://scholargate.app/id/compare