Bandingkan metode
Tinjau metode pilihan Anda berdampingan; baris yang berbeda akan disorot.
| Analisis Konten Hukum× | Analisis Wacana× | |
|---|---|---|
| Bidang≠ | Metode Lapangan | Penelitian Kualitatif |
| Keluarga | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Tahun asal≠ | 1940s–1970s (applied systematically to legal texts) | 1989 (Fairclough); 1987 (Potter & Wetherell) |
| Pencetus≠ | Interdisciplinary; foundational content analysis by Harold Lasswell (1940s); applied to legal texts by empirical legal scholars from the 1970s onward | Norman Fairclough; Jonathan Potter and Margaret Wetherell |
| Tipe≠ | Systematic qualitative-quantitative text analysis | Method |
| Sumber perintis≠ | Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology (2nd ed.). Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-0761915454 | Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman. link ↗ |
| Alias≠ | LCA, legal text analysis, jurimetric content analysis, statutory content analysis | DA, Critical Discourse Analysis, Discursive Analysis |
| Terkait≠ | 6 | 2 |
| Ringkasan≠ | Legal content analysis applies the systematic procedures of content analysis to legal texts — statutes, regulations, judicial opinions, treaties, and legal commentaries — in order to identify patterns, themes, and trends across a corpus of legal material. It bridges qualitative legal scholarship and quantitative social-science methods, enabling researchers to draw reproducible, evidence-based conclusions about how law is written, applied, or has changed over time. | Discourse analysis is a qualitative research methodology that examines how language, communication, and power shape meaning, identity, and social reality. Developed across linguistics, sociology, and psychology (particularly by Norman Fairclough and Jonathan Potter), discourse analysis goes beyond content to analyze language use as a social practice that constitutes and reflects power relations, ideologies, and social structures. |
| ScholarGateSet data ↗ |
|
|