Bandingkan metode
Tinjau metode pilihan Anda berdampingan; baris yang berbeda akan disorot.
| VIKOR Intuisionistik Bernilai Interval (Park, Cho & Kwun 2011)× | Proses Hirarki Analitik× | Proses Jaringan Analitik (AHP dengan umpan balik dan saling ketergantungan)× | Metode Terbaik-Terburuk× | Pentingnya Kriteria Melalui Korelasi Antar Kriteria× | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bidang | Pengambilan Keputusan | Pengambilan Keputusan | Pengambilan Keputusan | Pengambilan Keputusan | Pengambilan Keputusan |
| Keluarga | MCDM | MCDM | MCDM | MCDM | MCDM |
| Tahun asal≠ | 1989 | 1980 | 1996 | 2015 | 1995 |
| Pencetus≠ | Atanassov, K. T., Gargov, G. | Saaty, T. L. | Saaty, T. L. | Rezaei, J. | Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. |
| Tipe≠ | Compromise-ranking MCDM under Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy uncertainty (IVIFN: ⟨[μ⁻,μ⁺],[ν⁻,ν⁺]⟩; μ⁺+ν⁺ ≤ 1) — Lp-metric distance to interval-valued intuitionistic PIS | Pairwise comparison (eigenvalue) | Weight_Subjective (pairwise comparison, supermatrix, network structure) | Pairwise comparison (best-to-others + others-to-worst vectors), LP | Statistical contrast intensity + correlation-based objective weighting |
| Sumber perintis≠ | Atanassov, K. T., Gargov, G. (1989). Interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems DOI ↗ | Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York ISBN: 978-0070543713 | Saaty, T. L. (1996). Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh ISBN: 0-9620317-9-8 | Rezaei, J. (2015). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega DOI ↗ | Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method. Computers & Operations Research DOI ↗ |
| Alias | — | — | — | — | — |
| Terkait | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 |
| Ringkasan≠ | IVIF-VIKOR (Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy VIKOR (Park, Cho & Kwun 2011)) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Atanassov, K. T., Gargov, G. in 1989. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1980. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | ANP (Analytic Network Process (AHP with feedback and interdependences)) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1996. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | BWM (Best-Worst Method) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Rezaei, J. in 2015. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | CRITIC (CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. in 1995. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateSet data ↗ |
|
|
|
|
|