Bandingkan metode
Tinjau metode pilihan Anda berdampingan; baris yang berbeda akan disorot.
| Teori Beralasan Interpretif× | Inkuiri Naratif× | |
|---|---|---|
| Bidang≠ | Kualitatif | Penelitian Kualitatif |
| Keluarga | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Tahun asal≠ | 1967 (foundational); interpretivist articulation ~2000–2006 | 2000 |
| Pencetus≠ | Kathy Charmaz (interpretivist/constructivist strand); foundational grounded theory by Glaser & Strauss | D. Jean Clandinin and F. Michael Connelly |
| Tipe≠ | Qualitative research methodology | Method |
| Sumber perintis≠ | Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. Sage. ISBN: 978-0761973539 | Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. Jossey-Bass. link ↗ |
| Alias≠ | interpretivist grounded theory, constructivist grounded theory, IGT, grounded theory — interpretivist strand | Narrative Analysis, Narrative Research, Life Story Method |
| Terkait≠ | 6 | 3 |
| Ringkasan≠ | Interpretive grounded theory is a qualitative methodology that builds substantive theory inductively from data while working from an interpretivist epistemological stance. Developed most fully by Kathy Charmaz, it holds that researcher and participant co-construct meaning, that categories are created rather than discovered, and that the resulting theory is one plausible account among others rather than an objective rendering of social reality. | Narrative inquiry is a qualitative research methodology that treats stories and life narratives as primary data, analyzing how individuals construct meaning and identity through storytelling. Developed by D. Jean Clandinin and F. Michael Connelly (2000), narrative inquiry examines the narratives people tell about their lives, experiences, and transitions, understanding that people make sense of experience through narrative. |
| ScholarGateSet data ↗ |
|
|