ScholarGate
Asisten

Bandingkan metode

Tinjau metode pilihan Anda berdampingan; baris yang berbeda akan disorot.

Perluasan intuitif dari MABAC×Pentingnya Kriteria Melalui Korelasi Antar Kriteria×
BidangPengambilan KeputusanPengambilan Keputusan
KeluargaMCDMMCDM
Tahun asal20211995
PencetusLi, Y.Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L.
TipeIntuitionistic outranking/ranking — Intuitionistic Fuzzy Number (IFN: μ, ν; μ+ν ≤ 1)Statistical contrast intensity + correlation-based objective weighting
Sumber perintisPamučar, D., & Ćirović, G. (2015). The selection of transport and handling resources in logistics centers using Multi-Attributive Border Approximation area Comparison (MABAC). Expert Systems with Applications, 42(6), 3016-3028. [Canonical MABAC source; cited in place of the retracted Li (2021) intuitionistic-fuzzy MABAC paper, doi:10.1155/2021/5536751.] DOI ↗Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method. Computers & Operations Research DOI ↗
Alias
Terkait88
RingkasanIF-MABAC (Intuitionistic extension of MABAC) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Li, Y. in 2021. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CRITIC (CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. in 1995. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateSet data
  1. v1
  2. 1 Sumber
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Sumber
  3. PUBLISHED

Ke halaman pencarian Unduh salindia

ScholarGateBandingkan metode: IF-MABAC · CRITIC. Diakses 2026-06-18 dari https://scholargate.app/id/compare