Bandingkan metode
Tinjau metode pilihan Anda berdampingan; baris yang berbeda akan disorot.
| Riset Arsip Historis× | Riset Hukum Doktrinal× | |
|---|---|---|
| Bidang | Metode Lapangan | Metode Lapangan |
| Keluarga | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Tahun asal≠ | 19th century (formalized ~1820s–1880s) | 19th century (systematised ~1860s–1880s in common law jurisdictions) |
| Pencetus≠ | Historians and archivists; systematised through the professionalization of historical scholarship in the 19th century | Common law tradition; systematised by jurists such as A.V. Dicey and John Austin |
| Tipe≠ | Qualitative primary-source research | Legal-analytical research method |
| Sumber perintis≠ | Hill, M. R. (1993). Archival Strategies and Techniques. Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-0803951853 | Hutchinson, T. (2013). Researching and Writing in Law (3rd ed.). Thomson Reuters. ISBN: 9780455229829 |
| Alias | archival research, historical document analysis, archival history, primary source research | black-letter law research, legal doctrine analysis, analytical jurisprudence, traditional legal scholarship |
| Terkait | 6 | 6 |
| Ringkasan≠ | Historical archival research is a systematic method of investigating the past through the critical examination of primary source documents preserved in archives, libraries, and institutional collections. Researchers locate, access, authenticate, and interpret original records — such as government documents, correspondence, diaries, maps, and institutional files — to reconstruct events, trace processes, and build evidence-based historical arguments. It is foundational to historiography and widely applied across humanities and social science disciplines. | Doctrinal legal research is the foundational methodology of legal scholarship. It systematically identifies, reads, and analyses authoritative legal sources — statutes, case law, constitutional texts, and regulations — to describe, explain, and critique the content and internal logic of legal doctrine. By working within the accepted hierarchy of legal sources, it answers the question 'What is the law?' with analytical rigour and interpretive precision, producing descriptions of settled doctrine and arguments for how ambiguities should be resolved. |
| ScholarGateSet data ↗ |
|
|