ScholarGate
Asisten

Bandingkan metode

Tinjau metode pilihan Anda berdampingan; baris yang berbeda akan disorot.

Pemodelan Geomekanika×Klasifikasi Massa Batuan×
BidangGeosainsGeosains
KeluargaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Tahun asal1900s1974
PencetusCoulomb and MohrBieniawski and Barton
Tiperock behavior prediction pipelineengineering geology assessment pipeline
Sumber perintisJaeger, J. C., & Cook, N. G. W. (1979). Fundamentals of Rock Mechanics (2nd ed.). Chapman and Hall. link ↗Bieniawski, Z. T. (1989). Engineering Rock Mass Classifications. John Wiley & Sons. link ↗
Aliasmechanical earth modeling, stress modeling, rock mechanics simulationRMR system, Q-system classification, rock quality designation
Terkait54
RingkasanGeomechanical modeling is the numerical simulation of stress and deformation in rock masses, integrating rock properties, pressure conditions, and geometric constraints. Rooted in classical mechanics (Coulomb, Mohr) but modernized by finite element and finite difference methods, this approach is essential for well integrity assessment, reservoir compaction prediction, and stability evaluation of slopes and excavations. Models link subsurface geology to rock mechanical behavior.Rock mass classification is the systematic assessment of rock quality and mechanical behavior in engineering geology, combining field observations of jointing, weathering, and strength into a numerical index. Pioneered by Bieniawski (RMR system, 1974) and Barton (Q-system, 1974), these methods enable rapid site assessment and guide design of excavations, dams, and slopes. Classification bridges the gap between small laboratory samples and large field-scale behavior.
ScholarGateSet data
  1. v1
  2. 3 Sumber
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Sumber
  3. PUBLISHED

Ke halaman pencarian Unduh salindia

ScholarGateBandingkan metode: Geomechanical Modeling · Rock Mass Classification. Diakses 2026-06-18 dari https://scholargate.app/id/compare